The DNC Is On Trial For Fraud
A new report has been filed by former NSA experts that state that infamous DNC hack was not a hack at all, but rather a leak, executed by someone who had access to the organization. The same narrative that has exploded into a massive 21st century "red scare" has been revealed again to be essentially hot air.
On July 5th, a purported "hack" took place at the Democratic National Convention, which was almost immediately ascribed to Russian hackers on the basis of signature tools known to have been written by them in the past (ignoring the commonplace hacker's routine of imitating similar codes and software to mask himself for his own protection). This has led to the subsequent flood of "red scare" rhetoric, and honest belief that a man with 3rd grade intellect could collude with a former KGB spy.
What's worse than a false narrative driven by red bait at the sacrifice of foreign relations with a nuclear power is the corresponding media blackout which has followed. In a sickeningly ironic reversal, CNN and MSNBC have remained utterly silent on what has built up to be a very revealing court case, but have found exuberant portions of time to discuss investigations into members of the Trump orbit for collusion with Russia. This bloody political battlefield is awash with a "Democrats vs. Republicans" standoff clogging the 24 hr news cycle with a debate that started with an incident which they have seriously misunderstood, and a political party divided on the left by mistrust for an establishment that would overtly betray its constituency.
Written by Patrick Lawrence and published in "The Nation" on August 9th, Lawrence reveals that the latest of the ongoing digital investigation concludes that, first of all, there was no hack. The report describes a "leak" instead, stating the information was most likely downloaded onto a device with storage capacity (such as a USB flash drive, etc). The Nation's article refers explicitly to "an inside job by someone with access to the DNC's system". Secondly, forensic investigations of documents released by now infamous "Guccifer 2.0" reveal that the documents were tampered with before being released. In other words, the document was copied and pasted into a template which had Russian as its default language to cover their tracks. Again, this is based on the latest digital research being done by investigative teams surrounding the DNC lawsuit. Finally, The Nations article concludes by demanding that our governmental investigative agencies look into this new information.
This issue is finally emerging on smaller respected sources here and there, and gratefully beginning to sound less like the crazed ravings of paranoid twitter troll, and more like the serious issue that it is. It is worth noting at this point that when asked about the DNC Charter's promise to treat prospective nominees with fairness, the official response has been that, by their own account, they are not legally bound to the fairness they claim in said charter. Great way to mobilize your base, DNC. "Let's put hope on the ballot".